Custom Marlin rifles

[BigSky56]

Found this outfit advertized in rifle magazine, they have some nice rifles and prices too. danny
http://www.grizzlycustom.com/index.html

[rjohns94]

Nice, love the .22's

[BrentD]

Interesting things people will do to a rifle. But I was expecting something more like this


I may never forgive myself for letting this one get away.

[Mescalero]

Thanks Big Sky,
Got a bite on biological mothers house, I can see an 1894 in .357/.44 Bain&Davis in the future.

[BigSky56]

Brent what model & caliber looks old. danny

[BrentD]

It is a 95 in .45-70 I think. It is from about 1913 or a little later maybe.

[BrentD]

actually, the more I look at it, the more I think it has to be a 94. There is no screw for the trigger bar between the trigger and the front of receive on the left side. Both 93s and 95s have such a screw but 94s do not. I was looking for a 94 a while back, but I can't recall exactly what this was now.

The engraving comes directly from a painting by Robert Bruce Horsfall, 1911. It was published later in National Geographic in 1916.

[BigSky56]

I lean towards winchester & savage myself am working on a 94 havent decided on the configuration 94 or 64 have all the parts for 64 including a 64 24" bbl in 30 cal will make it a hunters gun. danny

[AJMD429]

Those forends are nice, but I'd like one that just has a short section of rail up front underneath, without the side-rails. Definitely nice to have something that ventilates the magazine tube area; I hate having to take off the wooden forend (and put it back) after a day out getting drizzled on. Might make a good addition to one of my 'Night Scouts' though...

[6pt-sika]

actually, the more I look at it, the more I think it has to be a 94. There is no screw for the trigger bar between the trigger and the front of receive on the left side. Both 93s and 95s have such a screw but 94s do not. I was looking for a 94 a while back, but I can't recall exactly what this was now.

The engraving comes directly from a painting by Robert Bruce Horsfall, 1911. It was published later in National Geographic in 1916.

The first couple years they made the 1895 it didn't have the screw you mention . I had a pair that were made in 1896 that didn't have the screw.

[airedaleman]

actually, the more I look at it, the more I think it has to be a 94. There is no screw for the trigger bar between the trigger and the front of receive on the left side. Both 93s and 95s have such a screw but 94s do not. I was looking for a 94 a while back, but I can't recall exactly what this was now.

The engraving comes directly from a painting by Robert Bruce Horsfall, 1911. It was published later in National Geographic in 1916.

It's a 1895. The 1894's lever pivots directly at the end of the bow.