Callifornia - Heads Up

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
JimT
Shootist
Posts: 5598
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm

Callifornia - Heads Up

Post by JimT »


(edit) - I do not know if this is true or not. It was sent by a friend who does not send garbage .. but it did come over the internet so it is suspect until proven ..... jimt


Tuesday, April 8, the Assembly Public Safety Committee will consider legislation that would require gun owners to obtain a "permit-to-purchase" before buying handgun ammunition. Assembly Bill 362 would require that law-abiding gun owners obtain a permit to buy handgun ammunition and would impose severe restrictions on the private transfers of handgun ammunition. Applicants for a "permit-to-purchase" would be required to submit to a background check, pay a $35 fee, and wait as long as 30 days to receive the permit. Under AB362, it would be unlawful to privately transfer more than 50 rounds of ammunition per month, even between family and friends. Ammunition retailers would have to be licensed and store ammunition in such a manner that it would be inaccessible to purchasers. The bill would also require vendors to keep a record of the transaction including the ammunition buyer's name, driver's license, the quantity, caliber and type of ammunition purchased, and right thumbprint, which would be submitted to the Department of Justice or the number of his handgun ammunition purchase permit. All ammunition sales in the State of California would be subject to a $3 per transaction tax. Lastly, mail order ammunition sales would be prohibited. Any violator of AB362 would be subject to civil fines.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquer ... B&site=sen


Last edited by JimT on Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
JReed
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5509
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:17 am
Location: SoCal

Post by JReed »

Thanks for the heads up Jim.
Jeremy
GySgt USMC Ret

To err is human, To forgive is devine, Neither of which is Marine Corps policy
Semper Fidelis
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14885
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Post by J Miller »

I suspect it is true. I've seen this reported at least twice so far and both from different sources.

Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
User avatar
Modoc ED
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3332
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Northeast CA (Alturas, CA)

Post by Modoc ED »

Wouldn't surprise me. It's a wonder they haven't done it sooner. There are other states that have ammunition purchase regulations. I don't know which ones off the top of my head but some states do require your name, driver's license number etc.

Technically, all ammunition that can be fired through a Thompson Center pistol could be classed as handgun ammunition. That would include .303 British, .30-06, .444 Marlin, .45-70, and on and on and on.

Just another day in paradise.
ED
Image
Yer never too old
jdad
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Oregon

Post by jdad »

AB 2062 is a Notary education bill.

http://www.nationalnotary.org/news/inde ... newsID=381

It's AB 362 and it ain't pretty, but it's not law yet. It would include rimfire ammo.

http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquer ... B&site=sen
User avatar
JimT
Shootist
Posts: 5598
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:04 pm

Post by JimT »

Thank you sir .. I will amend the email ....
wm
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:03 pm

Post by wm »

They tried something similar here in Michigan several years back.....they never got it out of committee because they included ALL ammo and that got enough hunters involved to shout it down.

I feared then they would learn from that experience and try it again with just handgun ammo, then mil surp calibers, sniper ammo, etc until they did it with all.

Wm
jdad
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Oregon

Post by jdad »

The way I read and interpreted this bill is that it really appears to be nothing more than a way to generate revenue, not ban anything.

It's the old, "if you want it bad enough you're going to pay for the priviledge to have it."
User avatar
Old Ironsights
Posting leader...
Posts: 15084
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Waiting for the Collapse
Contact:

Post by Old Ironsights »

jdad wrote:The way I read and interpreted this bill is that it really appears to be nothing more than a way to generate revenue, not ban anything.

It's the old, "if you want it bad enough you're going to pay for the priviledge to have it."
And what about reloaders? Will they be required to get a "Manufacturer's" license too?

The power to Tax is the Power to Destroy... and there is nothing they would like better than to destroy the shooting sports.
C2N14... because life is not energetic enough.
מנא, מנא, תקל, ופרסין Daniel 5:25-28... Got 7.62?
Not Depressed enough yet? Go read National Geographic, July 1976
Gott und Gewehr mit uns!
User avatar
Rimfire McNutjob
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3158
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Sanford, FL.

Post by Rimfire McNutjob »

Perhaps the CA legislature just feels like they're on a roll since the Condor Lead Ban passed. Maybe they're feeling lucky and are going to roll the dice again on something even more sinister. Good luck with that over there.
jdad
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3435
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Oregon

Post by jdad »

Old Ironsights wrote:
jdad wrote:"
And what about reloaders? Will they be required to get a "Manufacturer's" license too?
.
Don't go giving the enemy any ideas......
donw
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:37 am
Location: high desert of southern caliphornia

Post by donw »

you may rest assured the california state legislature will not rest until they're legislated away all of our gun rights.

i agree with an above reply that says it's just another revenue generating mechanism.

i signed a petetion in el cajon gun exchange protesting the legislation just a few days ago.

if you're inteersted, the assemblyman who intorduced it is Kevin de leon...send him your email...i did.
if you think you're influencial, try telling someone else's dog what to do---will rogers
95fan
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 257
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 11:48 pm
Location: San Diego,CA

Post by 95fan »

It seems like this keeps popping up every few years. We defeated it back in 2001 (IIRC) hopefully it will not go through now either.
A perfect day can only be achieved while hunting
Image
User avatar
MikeS.
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 528
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:23 pm

Post by MikeS. »

Like my sig line says...
MikeS.

Master Mason
Worshipful Master of Triluminar Lodge 117
Jefferson county, WV.
User avatar
otteray
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:25 pm
Location: Monterey Bay,CA and Tahoma, at Lake Tahoe CA

Post by otteray »

jdad wrote:
Old Ironsights wrote:
jdad wrote:"
And what about reloaders? Will they be required to get a "Manufacturer's" license too?
.
Don't go giving the enemy any ideas......
[img][img]http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f179/ ... iip198.jpg[/img][/img]
otteray
JP_TX
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: Texas

Post by JP_TX »

Just a postscript to whats been said. As a expatriot Califonian, The problem isn't with liberal legislators in Sacto. It's with the lazy non-voting, brainwashed public in CA.

Vote those rascals out of office. it is the only thing they understand.

Remember Prop 13? The property tax role back? The language in that bill said, to some effect, that the legislature could not produce new taxes without a majority, maybe even a super majority vote. This sounds like a tax increase to me. And it sounds like they are just ignoring inconvient laws to prevent them from doing as they wish.

That kind of think used to drive me crazy with I lived in CA. Living in TX now and I haven't been back to see the only thing I miss, the beautiful blue Pacific, since 1994.

I miss it but I can live without the ocean and the aggravation of masochistic citizens bent on socialism, that goes with it.

JP
JP_TX
444 Marlin
User avatar
handirifle
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:38 pm
Location: Central Coast of CA
Contact:

Post by handirifle »

JP_TX wrote: The problem isn't with liberal legislators in Sacto. It's with the lazy non-voting, brainwashed public in CA.

Well I hate to disagree, but the problem is, guns owners are a very small percentage of california citizens. Hunters are at less than ten percent of the pop and gun owners in general are about 15%.

No way can 15% "vote em out" especially when these power grabbing morons have alined their districts so they run virtually unchallenged. There are bills in the works and things trying to go to ballot that will solve THAT problem, but we are still a very small minority.

All the libs in Sacramento have to do is convince each other it's "for our good" and they vote it in.

Right now, our only power is getting our voice out in the open and make ourselves heard to convince enough people about the truth about guns and gun owners.
Bis
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 6:25 pm
Location: Crockett, Texas

Post by Bis »

I think that is why most of the people born and raised in Ca. and remember how good it use to be are now moving out. I am in the same boat as LP_TX. Been living in Texas for 7 years now and loving it.
when your enemy is within range so are you
User avatar
FWiedner
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: North Texas

Post by FWiedner »

Let them pass the law.

It will create a booming new black market in illegal ammo sales. A new Gold Rush.

It is time for the People of California to reclaim their freedom.

Tell your legislators and their thugs to go to hell.

:)
Government office attracts the power-mad, yet it's people who just want to be left alone to live life on their own terms who are considered dangerous.

History teaches that it's a small window in which people can fight back before it is too dangerous to fight back.
User avatar
mikld
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:46 pm
Location: So. Orygun!

Post by mikld »

I agree with most of the previous posts, but please remember that California is run by the big three; Los angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento. There are still a LOT of people living there that aren't liberal, anti-gun/hunting or gay.

I too, soon to be FROM CA! Retiring is summer of '08.
Mike
Vocatus atque non vocatus, Deus aderit...
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
Post Reply