Preferred length for M92?

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
KentuckyBlue
Levergunner
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:12 pm
Location: Lexington, KY

Preferred length for M92?

Post by KentuckyBlue »

I'm seriously considering a Rossi M92 in .357. Sort of deliberating what length barrel to get. Can you share your preferences/opinions? I don't hunt. I target shoot and I like to look at my guns. Just got on the kick of lever action rifles and it looks like it could be an expensive hobby. I like the Uberti 1873's; gulp..$$$$$$. I know that the Marlin's are popular too; I just like the thinner, sleeker rifles, but I'm open to all suggestions right now. Maybe I'll get more than one! LOL Thanks. I'm new here and am enjoying the site very much.

Ray
User avatar
Rimfire McNutjob
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3155
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:51 pm
Location: Sanford, FL.

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Rimfire McNutjob »

Personally, I think the smaller 92 frame looks best with a 20" barrel. But if you're target shooting, you might want that extra sight radius that a 24" barrel gets you. The balance point may be better with the shorter barrel but that can depend a lot on other factors as well ... such as whether you'll have a full length magazine or something shorter and/or the contour or weight of the barrel, etc.

Oh, and welcome. I just noticed this is your first post. Other highly opinionated people will be along shortly too.
... I love poetry, long walks on the beach, and poking dead things with a stick.
User avatar
J Miller
Member Emeritus
Posts: 14884
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Not in IL no more ... :)

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by J Miller »

My preferred length is 20". To me they look balanced. They feel balanced and will usually just hang there while you have the sights aligned. The longer sight radius also helps with accuracy.

The shorter length Trappers have their uses, and I have two of them, but the 20" guns get more use from me.

Joe
***Be sneaky, get closer, bust the cap on him when you can put the ball where it counts ;) .***
TriggerPhinger
Levergunner
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by TriggerPhinger »

I just shot my new Rossi M92 and love it! Mine is a 20 inch octagonal barrel with a case hardened receiver. The gun is nicely balanced and looks great!
Nate Kiowa Jones
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Contact:

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Nate Kiowa Jones »

Hi Ray,
Welcome to the fire. I work on, own and sell a lot of the Rossi 92's. for the cowboy action shooters I sell more 20" octagon guns than any other configuration. I think it is because it's a bit more handy than the 24" but retains some forward weight that helps stabilize the barrel for quicker sight.target acquisition.
I also sell to the NRA leveraction Silhouette shooters. Seem many of those folks prefer the 24" oct then the 20" oct.
For the hunters and general shooters I sell more 20" and 16" round barrel carbines.

Myself, I prefer the 20" round barrel.
Image
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765

Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550


http://www.stevesgunz.com

Email; steve@stevesgunz.com

Tel: 512-564-1015

Image
JerryB
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 5493
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:23 pm
Location: Batesville,Arkansas

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by JerryB »

Welcome to the forum. All of my Winchesters are 20 inch carbines except an old 1892 32wcf, it is a 24 inch rifle. My Rossi .357 and .45 Colt are both 20 inch carbines. I don't seem to have any sight trouble at longer ranges with the 20 inch and it sure works well for a truck gun. You get a little 20 inch Rossi .357 and it will end up living in your truck, they just seem at home there.
JerryB II Corinthians 3:17, Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

JOSHUA 24:15
User avatar
Griff
Posting leader...
Posts: 20850
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Griff »

Image and welcome to the Forum.

If I was to get another Rossi in .357 for target work, I would be getting the 24" octagon barrelled version from EMF with the CCH receiver.

Reasons:
octagon bbl - for stiffness, less flex is better.
24" length - longer sight radius, especially when you add a tang sight.
CCH - 'cause it's puurrrty.
EMF - 'cause I know the owner, their head sales guy & Nate handles 'em! :mrgreen:

Well! Now I hafta add another'n to the need list! :twisted: :P :lol:
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93

There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
tman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3243
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:43 pm

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by tman »

16" saddle ring carbine. it worked well for JOHN WAYNE :wink:
User avatar
Hobie
Moderator
Posts: 13902
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:54 pm
Location: Staunton, VA, USA
Contact:

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Hobie »

I'm a carbine guy. I might get a 16" someday but the 20" suits just fine.
Sincerely,

Hobie

"We are all travelers in the wilderness of this world, and the best that we find in our travels is an honest friend." Robert Louis Stevenson
User avatar
TedH
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 8249
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by TedH »

Welcome. I'll put in another vote for the 20" tube.
NRA Life Member
User avatar
AJMD429
Posting leader...
Posts: 32141
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Hoosierland
Contact:

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by AJMD429 »

If I could only have one, I might consider a 20" as a 'compromise' to be best all-around; after all, it's what most answers have been for THE best length.

On the other hand, if I were allowed TWO, I'd get a 16" round, and 24" octagonal. (Actually, the wife/boss DID allow me two, so I DID get those ones - :mrgreen: :mrgreen: ).

The 16" is as handy a little near-pistol 'carbine' as you'd ever want, yet can put a full magazine of lead in 4" at 50 yards every time. I put a Marble's "Bullseye" sight on mine, and made a fiber-optic (took a Dremel tool and hand-file to the factory front sight, and inserted a chunk of green fiberoptic in it) front on it, and it is FAST to get on target.
Link - http://www.levergunscommunity.com/viewt ... =1&t=21648

Image

The 24" is to me a 'traditional' looking gun, which I put a tang sight on (the Taurus one for $29 that is a clone of the Marble's) and a Lyman Globe front sight. I think if I do my part with good reloads, and those sights, on that gun, a 1" 50-yard group would be the norm every time.
Link - http://www.levergunscommunity.com/viewt ... =1&t=20359

ImageImage


Love them both...!
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.


Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
gak
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:35 pm
Location: Sunny Aridzona

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by gak »

I have em all lengths, but it's the 20" round-barrel carbine, like many have said, that gets used the most. One thing not specifically mentioned here that I've seen is, to me, it matters greatly what caliber we're talking about. Your .357 selection in a 24" with that small bore hole would get awfully heavy after awhile of toting--and specifically front end heavy. The .44 and .45 bore 20" and 24" octagonals are no lightweights either, but more tolerable. I don't do the CAS competition thing, so even the "short rifle" (20" octagonal) is a bit heavy for my tastes of carrying around. In .357, the 20" round-barreled carbine is the best all around compromise of capacity, portability and shootability, and has plenty (just the right amount) of front end heft.
ChuteTheMall
Levergunner
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:14 pm

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by ChuteTheMall »

Today I voted with my VISA card for the M92 in 20" length, round barrel, .357 magnum.

It's my first levergun, and this is my first post.

I compared it to the 24" octo which was $489 instead of $419.

I swung them both around a little (at a very large and crowded gunshow) and decided to go with lighter weight, shorter length, and lower price.

There was also a stainless 20" round available, I think it was about $439, and I was briefly tempted by the shiny metal. But only briefly, so I went with the blue.

Anyway, now there's another newbie in this thread and on this board, who's owned only one levergun for less than 3 hours. Glad to see my 20" choice validated by so many, including Nate Kiowa Jones who might someday do an action job on my 92. Let me break it in and shoot it for a year or so first. :)
MrMurphy
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1947
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:32 pm

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by MrMurphy »

I generally stick with a 20" as i'm not a pure target shooter and any rifle will see field time indoors or out, so "short and handy" whenever possible, is good.
User avatar
Warhawk
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 755
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:35 am
Location: Hot Springs, Arkansas

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Warhawk »

I prefer the 16 inch Trapper with the 20 inch Saddle Ring Carbine a close second.
User avatar
CowboyTutt
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Mission Viejo, CA

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by CowboyTutt »

Ditto the 20" round barrel. I have had one in 454 Casull for years and my best friend has a similar one in the 16" variety. There is no meaningful difference in velocity between the two (50 fps) but my 20" is just a little more stable, has good sight radius, and "splits the difference" between long range accuracy and quick handling. If your only looking at short range shooting and how fast a gun comes up to your shoulder, the 16" might be better for you, but the 20" is a very good compromise, looks right, feels right, and shoots well.

-Tutt
"It ain't dead! As long as there's ONE COWBOY taking care of ONE COW, it ain't dead!!!" (the Cowboy Way)
-Monte Walsh (Selleck version)

"These battered wings still kick up dust." -Peter Gabriel
2X22
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 933
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:08 am
Location: Salmon Creek, SW Washington

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by 2X22 »

Don't care much for carbines, I like rifles. 22" being minimum, 24 or 26" being perfect. I also like 'em with octagon barrels so I have some weight up front and she holds steady.

That being said, I've been putting on a lot of miles this summer with a 20" octagon short rifle that packs might nice 'cept I have to have 8 or 9 in the tube to get 'er to balance right.

2x22
"Yes, we did produce a near-perfect republic. But will they keep it? Or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom? Material abundance without character is the path of destruction." - Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Old Savage
Posting leader...
Posts: 16727
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Old Savage »

I like the 20".
In the High Desert of Southern Calif. ..."on the cutting edge of going back in time"...

Image
firefuzz
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:17 am
Location: Central Oklahoma

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by firefuzz »

I like 'em all, but the 20" carbine is my favorite.

Rob
Proud to be Christian American and not ashamed of being white.

May your rifle always shoot straight, your mag never run dry, you always have one more round than you have adversaries, and your good mate always be there to watch your back.

Because I can!

Never grow a wishbone where a backbone ought to be.
User avatar
COSteve
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3870
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:03 pm

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by COSteve »

Deleted
Last edited by COSteve on Thu May 01, 2014 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve
Retired and Living the Good Life
No Matter Where You Go, There You Are
Kansas Ed
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1261
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: Wichita

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Kansas Ed »

I've only kept 24" and longer rifles. Shorter barrels I've sold off, except for 2 with special history.

Ed
User avatar
KentuckyBlue
Levergunner
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:12 pm
Location: Lexington, KY

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by KentuckyBlue »

Nate Kiowa Jones wrote:Hi Ray,
Welcome to the fire. I work on, own and sell a lot of the Rossi 92's. for the cowboy action shooters I sell more 20" octagon guns than any other configuration. I think it is because it's a bit more handy than the 24" but retains some forward weight that helps stabilize the barrel for quicker sight.target acquisition.
I also sell to the NRA leveraction Silhouette shooters. Seem many of those folks prefer the 24" oct then the 20" oct.
For the hunters and general shooters I sell more 20" and 16" round barrel carbines.

Myself, I prefer the 20" round barrel.
Image
Steve: I like the one you are holding in your picture. Is that available on your web site? Also, just curious, what do folks use the 16" carbines for?
Nate Kiowa Jones
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Contact:

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Nate Kiowa Jones »

KentuckyBlue wrote:
Nate Kiowa Jones wrote:Hi Ray,
Welcome to the fire. I work on, own and sell a lot of the Rossi 92's. for the cowboy action shooters I sell more 20" octagon guns than any other configuration. I think it is because it's a bit more handy than the 24" but retains some forward weight that helps stabilize the barrel for quicker sight.target acquisition.
I also sell to the NRA leveraction Silhouette shooters. Seem many of those folks prefer the 24" oct then the 20" oct.
For the hunters and general shooters I sell more 20" and 16" round barrel carbines.

Myself, I prefer the 20" round barrel.
Steve: I like the one you are holding in your picture. Is that available on your web site? Also, just curious, what do folks use the 16" carbines for?

Hi Ray,
It's on there sorta. It shows up as the;
Rossi 1892 Carbine - The Big Loop "Duke"
But because it's custom built I can configure it as a 20" with the standard lever as well. If you will email me I'll get you some info.
Email is below.
I have sold several of the 16" trapper size guns in 454 Casull cal to the folks that spend time in bear country. The 16" in 454 with sling swivels is handy bear medicine.
Image

Notice the recoil pad. It aint enough. :o
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765

Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550


http://www.stevesgunz.com

Email; steve@stevesgunz.com

Tel: 512-564-1015

Image
User avatar
CowboyTutt
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 3716
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:27 pm
Location: Mission Viejo, CA

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by CowboyTutt »

Steve is right, without a premium pad on the Casull versions they are bruisers! -Tutt
"It ain't dead! As long as there's ONE COWBOY taking care of ONE COW, it ain't dead!!!" (the Cowboy Way)
-Monte Walsh (Selleck version)

"These battered wings still kick up dust." -Peter Gabriel
rjohns94
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 10820
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: York, PA

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by rjohns94 »

20 inches for me. perfect balance. and mine is in .357 also. Blessings. (though I would not mind 16 inches but I think 20 maximizes the potential of the .357.
Mike Johnson,

"Only those who will risk going too far, can possibly find out how far one can go." T.S. Eliot
User avatar
pokey
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2704
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: La center, wa.

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by pokey »

hhmmmmm.
P5030080.JPG
this one,

but..... if i ever get my gun fund back up to speed i'll pick up a 20" in 45colt. :wink:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
careful what you wish for, you might just get it.

"BECAUSE I CAN"
User avatar
Jacko
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:33 am
Location: Morayfield Qld Australia

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by Jacko »

I would not trade my 24"octagonal barrel .357 Rossi for the world. It points and swings beautifully when tracking fast moving game and the long sight radius is appreciated on the target range or in the field when longer shots present.

No matter what Rifle you buy fit a Tang sight, best money I ever spent on a Rifle

regards Jacko
brno602
Levergunner 2.0
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:03 pm
Location: Alberta Rocky's

Re: Preferred length for M92?

Post by brno602 »

I like my 16'' Barrel have to admit it is my first 92 type gun, My thinking was why get a long barrel for a pistol cal. I really like the 20'' in a 336 or 94 but in a trim little gun like a 92 that 16'' barrel is sweet! I love my 99s too, but to me they are in real rifle cals depends on how you look at it. 45gr of 748 in a 300 savage needs more barrel than 25gr of 296 or little gun in a .45 Colt, the colt is like a 22lr lot's of power in a tiny package.
But I also like long barrels in heavy gun's , So I think you need to buy a bunch of Levers in all types and sizes. I have 5, 99's, 1 Win 250, one Marlin 39, one 94 and one 86 and will soon buy back my 336 I sold.
If your a gun ''nut'' you really do need more than one barrel length in the type of gun you like kinda like golf clubs I guess? Iam looking for a used Rossi in .357 now with a 20 or 24'' barrel just because they don't make a .41 mag, just for the feel lol.
Try a bunch on for size at your local gun shop see what you like.
Post Reply