OT: Move over Columbus??

Welcome to the Leverguns.Com Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here ... politely.

Moderators: AmBraCol, Hobie

Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.

Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Ray Newman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2054
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: Between No Where & No Place, WA

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Ray Newman »

Gents: I should have typed December 2012 as the date when the Mayans supposedly predicted then end of world. I am a two-fingered typist and a poor proof reader.

Anyway, seems that since the Mayan calendar "ended" (??) sometime December 2012, it was interpreted by many that the Mayan predicted the end of the world. If I recall correctly, it was to happen around Christmas?? And here it is September 2014.
The most important aspect of this signature line is that you don't realize it doesn't say anything significant until you are just about done reading it & then it is too late to stop reading it....
Grand Poo Bah WA F.E.S.

In real life may you be the bad butt that you claim to be on social media.
BrentD

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BrentD »

Ray Newman wrote:Gents: I should have typed December 2012 as the date when the Mayans supposedly predicted then end of world. I am a two-fingered typist and a poor proof reader.

Anyway, seems that since the Mayan calendar "ended" (??) sometime December 2012, it was interpreted by many that the Mayan predicted the end of the world. If I recall correctly, it was to happen around Christmas?? And here it is September 2014.

Yeah, I know but it was fun to play with a new end of the world prediction for a moment. However, in the case of the Mayans, I don't think the predicted the end at that point, they simply stopped their calendar there for reasons of space/time/etc.
Ray Newman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2054
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: Between No Where & No Place, WA

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Ray Newman »

Brent: you are onto some thing there.
The most important aspect of this signature line is that you don't realize it doesn't say anything significant until you are just about done reading it & then it is too late to stop reading it....
Grand Poo Bah WA F.E.S.

In real life may you be the bad butt that you claim to be on social media.
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Mescalero »

In the Mustang mountains of Az. there is a gravestone with the name of an Englishman on it.
It is inscribed in some form of Old English, the date is pre- Columbus.
That would suggest there were at least two.
Ray Newman
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2054
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: Between No Where & No Place, WA

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Ray Newman »

Mescalaro: could it be another "Drake's Plate" ??

For those not familiar with the Drake's Plate hoax/forgery, see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake%27s_Plate_of_Brass
The most important aspect of this signature line is that you don't realize it doesn't say anything significant until you are just about done reading it & then it is too late to stop reading it....
Grand Poo Bah WA F.E.S.

In real life may you be the bad butt that you claim to be on social media.
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Mescalero »

Anything is possible, but the geologist thought the stone matched the date.
The writing on the stone, depth, weathering, etc.
765x53
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:12 pm
Location: Bushwhacker Capitol, Missouri

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by 765x53 »

bulldog1935 wrote:I know the Canadian flows into the Red - I bet the Cimarron does, too.
But the Red flows into the Atchafalaya and that into the Mississippi.
In case you don't know, the Mississippi delta is now a manmade artifact.
The whole river would turn into the Atchafalaya now except for a series of dams that make the two rivers flow backwards to divert 70% of the flow to NOLA.
Nature would have the tides washing away NOLA and the new delta would be growing faster at Morgan City.

According to my Oklahoma map, the Canadian and the Cimarron flow separately into the Arkansas, which flows into the Mississippi.
User avatar
Gallo Pazzesco
Levergunner
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:12 pm
Location: Capital City, South Carolina

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Gallo Pazzesco »

I think it's pretty-much a given, a foregone conclusion, that both the Vikings and Polynesians came to American centuries before Columbus.

They have found Polynesian skulls, bones and boats on the coast of California dating back 3,000 years, Viking boats on the coast of Washington and elsewhere. (sic: Norse, led by Leif Ericson) They've found 2,000 year old arrowheads on the Hawaiian Islands made from New Mexico quarried obsidian.

Italians are not happy.

Heck, there is even some dispute now as to whether or not Columbus was Italian but possibly rather Spanish or Portuguese living in Genoa.
What you think about, you do ... what you do, you become.
2/325 PIR, 1/509 ABCTImage4/325 ABCT, Master Parachutist
bdhold

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by bdhold »

Ray Newman wrote:Gents: I should have typed December 2012 as the date when the Mayans supposedly predicted then end of world. I am a two-fingered typist and a poor proof reader.

Anyway, seems that since the Mayan calendar "ended" (??) sometime December 2012, it was interpreted by many that the Mayan predicted the end of the world. If I recall correctly, it was to happen around Christmas?? And here it is September 2014.
if you asked a Mayan they would say it had to end somewhere.
Gregorian calendars end every 4 years.
The Mayans had greater vision.

Okinawans sailors assimilated in South America and California before Columbus
Last edited by bdhold on Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
bdhold

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by bdhold »

765x53 wrote: According to my Oklahoma map, the Canadian and the Cimarron flow separately into the Arkansas, which flows into the Mississippi.
OK, thanks, I didn't check a map
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11987
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Grizz »

here's a for instance about my assertion that it is highly likely that ocean crossings were made in paleo times. this is not a paleo boat, but there is nothing about this modern day arctic voyage that could not have been achieved by an umiak or log canoe or a variety of other vessels. the arctic can be circumnavigated in these conditions and was done so by the northern peoples. it is not much of a stretch to drop down into europe, or cruise up and across from europe or asia, either one is equally accessible.

anyways, this is interesting reading:

http://www.duckworksmagazine.com/09/out ... /index.htm

Grizz
BrentD

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BrentD »

Hot off the presses - the peopling of the Nearctic.

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6200/1004.full
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Mescalero »

I would have liked to read it :cry:
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Blaine »

Grizz wrote:here's a for instance about my assertion that it is highly likely that ocean crossings were made in paleo times. this is not a paleo boat, but there is nothing about this modern day arctic voyage that could not have been achieved by an umiak or log canoe or a variety of other vessels. the arctic can be circumnavigated in these conditions and was done so by the northern peoples. it is not much of a stretch to drop down into europe, or cruise up and across from europe or asia, either one is equally accessible.

anyways, this is interesting reading:

http://www.duckworksmagazine.com/09/out ... /index.htm

Grizz
Of equal interest was their statement that the arctic ice was MUCH heavier than normal....Bite Me, Al Gore :lol:
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11987
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Grizz »

yeah, and the kicker is the trip was in 2009
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Mescalero »

You anti global warming guys amuse me.
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11987
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Grizz »

Mescalero wrote:You anti global warming guys amuse me.
that's not me, I'm not against it. I am 100% for global warming. the world is a much nicer place to live today than it was twenty thousand years ago. people grow food where ice used to be a mile thick.

you ever try to grow a tomato on a glacier? I think you would pray for a warm globe if you had.

rest assured, exactly like a market reversal inflection point where the highest offer is rejected, and the crash down takes off from that point, exactly like that, when the globe stops warming and starts cooling, the mile high ice will be on the plains in a geological heartbeat.
global_temp_map.jpg
study this climate map and you will soon see that warm spells are narrow timeframes and they end suddenly, almost instantly. the only time you can eat what you like when you like to is when you are in a warm period. if you look at the map you will see that they are few and far between.

AND, MORE TO THE POINT, THE ICE STARTS COMING BACK THE INSTANT THE GLOBE STOPS WARMING UP. STOPPING GLOBAL WARMING WILL START GLOBAL GLACIATION. HOW PATHETIC IS THAT?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BAGTIC »

Now why would Chinese or anyone else come here looking for Port Orford cedar for their boat masts. They obviously had good enough masts to get all the way here before they left home. Furthermore how would they know that Port Orford Cedar existed here until after they were already here which precludes it being the reason they came in the first place.

Much of these historical interpretations depend on someone having an agenda to further in the first place.

Did Marco Polo discover China? There is some doubt. Why would someone who made such a trip neglect to mention the Great Wall of China the largest structure on earth. Did he really go or just assemble a collection of tales told by others, an anthology like the Bible.

Why do Italians celebrate Columbus Day? There is no evidence he was Italian and good evidence that he wasn't. Good case for his being Greek. He wrote in Greek and Spanish, not Italian. Italian Americans just wanted a holiday?

It is like American Hispanics claiming Farragut was the first Hispanic admiral in the USN when in fact he was American born and his father was a British citizen. Political agenda.

Why aren't Spaniards 'Hispanic'? Political agenda.
piller
Posting leader...
Posts: 15239
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: South of Dallas

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by piller »

The Cimarron used to flow out near Liberal in SouthWestern Kansas. It is now dry. Has been since Colorado stopped the flow of water to the Arkansas river, and thus to the Cimarron. Looking for artifacts near the Cimarron would be easy now.

As far as who got to where first, that will always be up for debate. I am wondering if the people who were actually first were here before continental drift broke up Pangea. They might have been subsequently attacked and wiped out. Then, another wave of invaders may have taken over from the second group, and so on.

Several years ago, I saw some sort of Discovery Channel special where there were red haired, green eyed mummies found in China that the carbon 14 dating showed them to pre-date the Chinese people. Then, there was a Native American tribe that tended to be blond haired and blue eyed. In modern times, we had Ishi come out of the wilds in California. Though his tribe was thought to be extinct, they were related to another tribe who are still around in Northern California. What I am saying is that we don't know it all, and what we think we know may be based on incorrect information since humans have a habit of moving from place to place and our ancestors did not always leave evidence that would last.

As far as the end of the World, I don't know and am trying to just be ready to accept it when or if it comes in my lifetime. I have no control over it, and cannot be disappointed if it does not happen in my lifetime.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
BrentD

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BrentD »

piller wrote:As far as who got to where first, that will always be up for debate. I am wondering if the people who were actually first were here before continental drift broke up Pangea. They might have been subsequently attacked and wiped out. Then, another wave of invaders may have taken over from the second group, and so on.
Check your old calendars for the dates of the break up of Pangaea and Gondwanaland.
:)
piller
Posting leader...
Posts: 15239
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: South of Dallas

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by piller »

I know, that supposedly happened before modern humans existed. Funny thing, there are not many fossil records of the smaller species from back then. We would have been a smaller species back then, and would have been on the menu.
D. Brian Casady
Quid Llatine Dictum Sit, Altum Viditur.
Advanced is being able to do the basics while your leg is on fire---Bill Jeans
Don't ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up---Robert Frost
BrentD

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BrentD »

Pangaea broke up about 200 million years ago, give or take a few months :).

Mammals have been around only 65 million years, and so the whole class Mammalia wasn't available for the ride. Within mammals anything even remotely human like is not older than 3-4 million years as I recall. So, I think your idea of epic battles for the continent just aren't really plausible given scale of the differences in time.

Putting humans on North America prior to 25 thousand (not even close to 1 million, never mind 200 million) just doesn't hold up.
bdhold

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by bdhold »

Koreans believe they're the ancestors of native Americans.
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11987
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Grizz »

glad to see this one resurface. was just reading this one today, it doesn't answer everyone's questions, but it does give a reliable picture of what is going to happen if the brilliant ones manage to stop climate warming:

http://hugefloods.com/Pleistocene.html

fun links too

Grizz
User avatar
jeepnik
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6914
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:39 pm
Location: On the Beach

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by jeepnik »

Ray Newman wrote:Gents: I should have typed December 2012 as the date when the Mayans supposedly predicted then end of world. I am a two-fingered typist and a poor proof reader.

Anyway, seems that since the Mayan calendar "ended" (??) sometime December 2012, it was interpreted by many that the Mayan predicted the end of the world. If I recall correctly, it was to happen around Christmas?? And here it is September 2014.
Just one more prediction of the end of the world that didn't come true. Then again, if it had I guess we wouldn't be talking about it. :mrgreen:
Jeepnik AKA "Old Eyes"
"Go low, go slow and preferably in the dark" The old Sarge (he was maybe 24.
"Freedom is never more that a generation from extinction" Ronald Reagan
"Every man should have at least one good rifle and know how to use it" Dad
BrentD

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BrentD »

The calendar in my kitchen ends on 31 December of this year. I guess the new End of the World is only 2.5 months away. :roll:
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BAGTIC »

The fact that some Norse long ships had jade Buddhas does not prove that the Norse traveled to China. I have things in my house from many different countries none of which I have ever visited. It only shows that there were trade routes along which goods were passed.

Why did Marco Polo never mention the Great Wall of China in his diary. Perhaps he was never in China but was merely retelling tales pass along from one merchant to another. It was unlikely that he had been to China without seeing he Wall and why would he not have remarked on it considering other relatively trivial observations?

Do to others as you would have them do to you. Jesus prior to approximately 35 A.D.

Do not unto others what you would not they should do unto you.” Confucius prior to death in 479 B.C.

Does this prove Jesus knew Confucius? Had been to China? Read Chinese? None of the above?

Why do Italians celebrate Columbus Day when Columbus was not Italian and apparently did not even read Italian as all his writings were in Spanish, Greek, or Latin?

People with an ax to grind or a cause to promote often make wild leaps in their furtherance.
User avatar
sore shoulder
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 2611
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:51 pm
Location: 9000ft in the Rockies

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by sore shoulder »

octagon wrote:How do you "Discover" a country when kajillions of folks are already living there, having already formed a complex society? There were Native Americans living quite nicely all over the dang place before Chris or anyone else (Vikings) showed up. I guess I "discovered" Mexico on my last visit.
There's more an more evidence that what is currently being called the "native americans" were not here first. In spite of the fact that they conspire to stop all archaeological study by declaring areas with remains "sacred burial sites".
"He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance." Declaration of Independance, July 4, 1776
11B30
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11987
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Grizz »

There were Native Americans living quite nicely all over the dang plac
No way were they living quite nicely. They were robbing, pillaging, looting, raping, kidnaping, murdering, torturing, sacrificing, and other forms of mayhem, similar to isis in arabia, for most of their entire history. when they couldn't find any barbarians to murder they turned on themselves. Their societies were similar to all human societies, periods of absolute debauched depravity punctuated by short recovery periods. It's human nature.
Does this prove Jesus knew Confucius?
Of course Jesus knows Confucius, He created Confucius. He knew Confucius in his mother's womb.

Grizz
firefuzz
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:17 am
Location: Central Oklahoma

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by firefuzz »

Lastmohecken wrote:
BlaineG wrote:
octagon wrote:How do you "Discover" a country when kajillions of folks are already living there, having already formed a complex society? There were Native Americans living quite nicely all over the dang place before Chris or anyone else (Vikings) showed up. I guess I "discovered" Mexico on my last visit.
The current iteration of NAs displaced a couple kajillion other NAs themselves. War and conquest has been a central part of humanity. I don't think we can put the genie back in the bottle. Give it a few hundred years. It looks like White folk are on the way out :roll:
Yes, except this world don't have a few hundred years left, before divine intervention. But whites do seem to be on our way out, because we are too liberal, too stupid, too lazy to vote, too independent, and too soft-hearten to protect what we have.
I'm hoping you're wrong about this, but fearful that you're not. I just had this discussion with a good friend a couple of days ago. If the liberals don't quit forcing political correctness on us, either that or we just stand up and say "screw you", we're doomed. And until we're ready to get down in the gutter with them and cut off a few heads and light up a few terrorist ourselves we'll never win this.

My cousin retired from the US Army after 30 plus years of service about 2 years ago. Just this last week he finished selling his 80 acre "dream farm" that he's been paying for for the last 20 years and moving to Golfito, Costa Rico. He was so sick of US policy on terrorist and situation like Ferguson, MO that he couldn't stand living here any longer. He bought a small place down there with a nice house on it and it already building another big house to move into. The other house he's keeping for any of our family that wants to come down there to live in until they can get established.

If it wasn't for my grandbabies I'd be packing.

Rob
Proud to be Christian American and not ashamed of being white.

May your rifle always shoot straight, your mag never run dry, you always have one more round than you have adversaries, and your good mate always be there to watch your back.

Because I can!

Never grow a wishbone where a backbone ought to be.
Gobblerforge
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Eastern Ohio, Foothills of Appalachia
Contact:

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Gobblerforge »

Now that we have the ability, look at Google Earth and you can see the ocean depths. If you lower the oceans to glacial levels, you will see that humans could almost walk here from Europe around the north rim with only a few short boat trips. This is no different than the Bearing Strait crossing the Mongols used. Then if you take the lower ocean levels into consideration, you also get this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bh2QwvR3aOo With Atlantis in the middle, the ocean stretches weren't as long.
Gobbler
Click Click Boom
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Blaine »

Gobblerforge wrote:Now that we have the ability, look at Google Earth and you can see the ocean depths. If you lower the oceans to glacial levels, you will see that humans could almost walk here from Europe around the north rim with only a few short boat trips. This is no different than the Bearing Strait crossing the Mongols used. Then if you take the lower ocean levels into consideration, you also get this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bh2QwvR3aOo With Atlantis in the middle, the ocean stretches weren't as long.
Gobbler
That was enlightening....I hope that's true, and not a hoax.... :( More, and more myths, and old stories are proving true.... Science has even found God in the Big Bang....
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Mescalero »

You are dilusional.
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Blaine »

Mescalero wrote:You are dilusional.
About God? It doesn't have to be the Christian God...... God, no matter what he's called, just IS.......(Not Izlam....that Alpha Hotel allah is a whole nother story....)
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Mescalero »

It was a celestrial event, nothing more.
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Blaine »

Mescalero wrote:It was a celestrial event, nothing more.
:?:
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
Mescalero
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 6180
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:21 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Mescalero »

There was no god involved........................ it just happened.
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11987
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Grizz »

Mescalero wrote:There was no god involved........................ it just happened.
what just happened?
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Blaine »

Mescalero wrote:There was no god involved........................ it just happened.
In the beginning there was nothing....how did nothing happen? 8)
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
Gobblerforge
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Eastern Ohio, Foothills of Appalachia
Contact:

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Gobblerforge »

[/quote]In the beginning there was nothing....how did nothing happen? 8) [/quote]
Oh, that's easy. I planted some flower seeds one time and watched them for days. Nothing happened. :D
Click Click Boom
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BAGTIC »

bulldog1935 wrote:Koreans believe they're the ancestors of native Americans.

I believe the general consensus is that Amerindians originated in Siberia in the Amur River watershed. Not far from Korea.
BAGTIC
Levergunner 3.0
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:37 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by BAGTIC »

Grizz wrote:
There were Native Americans living quite nicely all over the dang plac
No way were they living quite nicely. They were robbing, pillaging, looting, raping, kidnaping, murdering, torturing, sacrificing, and other forms of mayhem, similar to isis in arabia, for most of their entire history. when they couldn't find any barbarians to murder they turned on themselves. Their societies were similar to all human societies, periods of absolute debauched depravity punctuated by short recovery periods. It's human nature.
Does this prove Jesus knew Confucius?
Of course Jesus knows Confucius, He created Confucius. He knew Confucius in his mother's womb.

Grizz

Confucius predated Jesus. Jesus did not create anything or any one. He was the letter carrier delivering a message not the OEM.
User avatar
Blaine
Posting leader...
Posts: 30495
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: Still Deciding

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Blaine »

Confucius predated Jesus. Jesus did not create anything or any one. He was the letter carrier delivering a message not the OEM.
How about the Trinity? Maybe Jesus was with His Father, and was sent down like you said.
The Rotten Fruit Always Hits The Ground First

Proud Life Member Of:
NRA
Second Amendment Foundation
Citizens Committee For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
DAV
User avatar
Grizz
Advanced Levergunner
Posts: 11987
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:15 pm

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by Grizz »

Confucius predated Jesus. Jesus did not create anything or any one. He was the letter carrier delivering a message not the OEM.
Thank you for your opinion Sir. You are incorrect, and I will offer factual evidence for the Truth, because Truth matters. I only contest this because "it is appointed to man to die once, and after that judgement before God". Your soul is worth more to Christ than all the wealth of all the world we inhabit, which is why He died bearing our sins, so we could live with Him after this life.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
John 1. The darkness referred to here includes the misinformation you believe. The Word refers to Christ. He created the universe and everything in it and all life.
"Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works themselves."
John 7. Christ declares Himself to be God in the flesh. He came this way specifically to enable men to relate to their Creator. But unlike all the other claimants, Christ PROVED His credentials via His resurrection from the grave, and He authenticated His claims by fulfilling hundreds of ancient prophesies that predate Him by hundreds of years.
“Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God; believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many rooms. If it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. And you know the way to where I am going.” Thomas said to him, “Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?” Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on you do know him and have seen him.”
John 14. Again Christ assures his followers, and reassures them. And states that there is one and only one way to live with God in His kingdom.

After His death on the cross, burial, and resurrection:
"Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you.” Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side. Do not disbelieve, but believe.” Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.
John 20. This passage is where the quote "doubting Thomas" comes from. Christ showed Himself to his followers over a period of 40 days after His resurrection. When He ascended to heaven He did it in public before 500 witnesses.
Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.
John 20. Everyone lives forever. Not everyone lives in the same place forever. The life that Christ promises here is eternal life in His presence. He creates this life because He is the Creator, the only God in existence, the only hope of everlasting life.
25 And he said to them, “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?” And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself.
John 20.

And this last is God's certification of the Truth, and God's authentication of the evidence so that all us doubters can be persuaded of the Truth, and believe Him, and receive eternal life. Christ made this connection many times during his ministry years.

HERE IS THE EVIDENCE: Christ referred to "all that the prophets have spoken." There are more than 300 specific prophesies concerning just Jesus, the time of His birth, the place of His birth, the place of His death, the manner of His death, His foster parents, his childhood, etc. All of which were written hundreds of years prior to His birth, by numerous authors.

The probability of just this subset of 300 fulfilled prophesies NOT being divine revelation is ONE times TEN followed by 168 zeros. 1X10^168, or impossible that it is not TRUE TRUTH.

For reference there are 1X10^80 subatomic particles in the universe, a tiny number compared to the probability above.


This is the corresponding probability that you, Sir, are correct. One chance in 10^168. One slim and impossible chance to hang your hopes on. I urge you to reconsider your position, to repent (change your mind) and turn to this authenticated proven and only God, accept Christ's sacrifice in your place, and receive the gift of eternal life, as promised above. This is the Gospel, and it is truly Good News.

I was a doubter, a hater, a scoffer, a mocker. I heard this message and His Blood covered all my sin, and Christ saved me. He wants to save you'all too.

In Christ,
Grizz
User avatar
SteveR
Senior Levergunner
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:14 am
Location: New York

Re: OT: Move over Columbus??

Post by SteveR »

Grizz wrote:
Confucius predated Jesus. Jesus did not create anything or any one. He was the letter carrier delivering a message not the OEM.
Thank you for your opinion Sir. You are incorrect, and I will offer factual evidence for the Truth, because Truth matters. I only contest this because "it is appointed to man to die once, and after that judgement before God". Your soul is worth more to Christ than all the wealth of all the world we inhabit, which is why He died bearing our sins, so we could live with Him after this life.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
John 1. The darkness referred to here includes the misinformation you believe. The Word refers to Christ. He created the universe and everything in it and all life.
"Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else believe on account of the works themselves."
John 7. Christ declares Himself to be God in the flesh. He came this way specifically to enable men to relate to their Creator. But unlike all the other claimants, Christ PROVED His credentials via His resurrection from the grave, and He authenticated His claims by fulfilling hundreds of ancient prophesies that predate Him by hundreds of years.
“Let not your hearts be troubled. Believe in God; believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many rooms. If it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you? And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. And you know the way to where I am going.” Thomas said to him, “Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?” Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you had known me, you would have known my Father also. From now on you do know him and have seen him.”
John 14. Again Christ assures his followers, and reassures them. And states that there is one and only one way to live with God in His kingdom.

After His death on the cross, burial, and resurrection:
"Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you.” Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side. Do not disbelieve, but believe.” Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.
John 20. This passage is where the quote "doubting Thomas" comes from. Christ showed Himself to his followers over a period of 40 days after His resurrection. When He ascended to heaven He did it in public before 500 witnesses.
Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.
John 20. Everyone lives forever. Not everyone lives in the same place forever. The life that Christ promises here is eternal life in His presence. He creates this life because He is the Creator, the only God in existence, the only hope of everlasting life.
25 And he said to them, “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?” And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself.
John 20.

And this last is God's certification of the Truth, and God's authentication of the evidence so that all us doubters can be persuaded of the Truth, and believe Him, and receive eternal life. Christ made this connection many times during his ministry years.

HERE IS THE EVIDENCE: Christ referred to "all that the prophets have spoken." There are more than 300 specific prophesies concerning just Jesus, the time of His birth, the place of His birth, the place of His death, the manner of His death, His foster parents, his childhood, etc. All of which were written hundreds of years prior to His birth, by numerous authors.

The probability of just this subset of 300 fulfilled prophesies NOT being divine revelation is ONE times TEN followed by 168 zeros. 1X10^168, or impossible that it is not TRUE TRUTH.

For reference there are 1X10^80 subatomic particles in the universe, a tiny number compared to the probability above.


This is the corresponding probability that you, Sir, are correct. One chance in 10^168. One slim and impossible chance to hang your hopes on. I urge you to reconsider your position, to repent (change your mind) and turn to this authenticated proven and only God, accept Christ's sacrifice in your place, and receive the gift of eternal life, as promised above. This is the Gospel, and it is truly Good News.

I was a doubter, a hater, a scoffer, a mocker. I heard this message and His Blood covered all my sin, and Christ saved me. He wants to save you'all too.

In Christ,
Grizz
Thanks Grizz,

You explain it very well. Sometimes people just need to hear the Word, then sometime in the future it all clicks together, and they can put their doubts aside, and then hear the truth.

Steve
Post Reply