Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
- KirkD
- Desktop Artiste
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:52 am
- Location: Central Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
That Ballistol trick is good to know. I tend to be a perfectionist when I clean BP out of my arms, especially sixguns, so it turns out to be about a one hour process per gun. Part of the problem is not knowing how much cleaning is enough, since no one else around here shoots BP in their old guns. You are right about the old corrosive primers. In my opinion, they did more damage than BP ever did, judging from how the first inch of the bore in front of the throat looks in a lot of old guns.
Kirk: An old geezer who loves the smell of freshly turned earth, old cedar rail fences, wood smoke, a crackling fireplace on a snowy evening, pristine wilderness lakes, the scent of
cedars and a magnificent Whitetail buck framed in the semi-buckhorn sights of a 120-year old Winchester.
Blog: https://www.kirkdurston.com/
cedars and a magnificent Whitetail buck framed in the semi-buckhorn sights of a 120-year old Winchester.
Blog: https://www.kirkdurston.com/
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4559
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:52 pm
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Bravo! Too much to absorb at one sitting - archiving all pages of this blog. Good work, gentlemen - very impressive research, observations, and dialog.
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Unless I am loading HV .44-40 cartridges I steer clear of 2400. It's perfect for smaller cases line the .25-20 and .32-20, but Unique, and in some cases Bullseye, works best for the larger cases, like the .38 and .44-40. Like Sixgun said 6.5 grains Unique is perfect for the older SAs, S&Ws, '73 Winchesters, Colt Lightnings, and other guns of that era. I go up to 8 grains for my "smokeless" Frontier Six Shooters. Many thousands of happy rounds run through those guns and they haven't changed one iota.
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Personally, being somewhat of a traditionalist, the original 44-40 smokeless rounds contained 14 -17 grs. of powder, depending on the propellant used. THerefore, the vast majority of my 44-40 cartridges are loaded with powders within that range. I find that 2400 and 4227 to be excellent in that role.
w30wcf
w30wcf
aka John Kort
aka Jack Christian SASS 11993 "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." Philippians 4:13
aka w44wcf (black powder)
NRA Life member
.22 WCF, .30 WCF, .44 WCF Cartridge Historian
aka Jack Christian SASS 11993 "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." Philippians 4:13
aka w44wcf (black powder)
NRA Life member
.22 WCF, .30 WCF, .44 WCF Cartridge Historian
- AJMD429
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 32215
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
- Location: Hoosierland
- Contact:
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Yep - VERY educational...!JohndeFresno wrote:Bravo! Too much to absorb at one sitting - archiving all pages of this blog. Good work, gentlemen - very impressive research, observations, and dialog.
One OTHER issue comes to mind as far as 'old steel' vs. 'new steel' - not just the bursting strength, and stretch, but how about compression as in pressure-peening the chamber or even bore sidewalls? Is that just basically incorporated into 'stretch' engineering? I just wonder if rapid-spiking pressure would tend to compress the steel, short of actually bursting it, or if that would show up as 'stretch' when people measured their guns after extensive rapid-spike powder use.
Personally, I plan to stick with the slow-spike smokeless loads for the reasons KirkD mentions, but this has been a very interesting thread.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Has anyone actually taken examples of antique steels, perhaps otherwise unsalvagable frames, cylinders,etc, and subjected them to destructive metallurgical testing? It would be satisfying to see real numbers attached to this discussion. I've not turned up much in the past beside some second hand references to testing of decarbonized steels used in late 19th century shotgun barrels, the elastic limit given was in the 25000 psi range although i have no information on the manufacturer. Kuhnhausen has rockwell tested a number of SAA frames, but the jury is out on whether hardness can be directly related to tensile strength. Subjectively, I own two first gen saa Colts, an 1899 non VP and a 1905 VP. Even hand tighting a screw you can "feel" the difference in the steel as the screw torques up; less "strech" in the 1905. I shoot
Trailboss, by the way, in both of them as they have 2nd gen cylinders. I find it easy and as accurate as i need to be for moderate plinking duty, but this thread has got me interested in working up loads with some the the mentioned powders.
Nice to see a thoughtful and informed discussion on this topic instead of the knee-jerk hysteria that is usually provoked by the idea of using smokless in "BLACK POWDER" guns.
Trailboss, by the way, in both of them as they have 2nd gen cylinders. I find it easy and as accurate as i need to be for moderate plinking duty, but this thread has got me interested in working up loads with some the the mentioned powders.
Nice to see a thoughtful and informed discussion on this topic instead of the knee-jerk hysteria that is usually provoked by the idea of using smokless in "BLACK POWDER" guns.
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Seeing Driftwood's post about VP marks on Colt SAs made me take a look at mine. None of my 1st Generation, 1903-08 guns have that mark. These old shooters have had countless rounds fired through them with absolutely no issues.
"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged"....President Abraham Lincoln
- Bryan Austin
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:05 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Another forum with the same guys
Again, great topic, pards and information!
Again, great topic, pards and information!
44-40 website - https://sites.google.com/view/44winchester/
44-40 Forum - https://44-40.forumotion.com/?fbclid=Iw ... XqHFnpPtgI
aka Savvy Jack
44-40 Forum - https://44-40.forumotion.com/?fbclid=Iw ... XqHFnpPtgI
aka Savvy Jack
- Bryan Austin
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:05 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Which do you prefer for revolver and rifle?w30wcf wrote:Personally, being somewhat of a traditionalist, the original 44-40 smokeless rounds contained 14 -17 grs. of powder, depending on the propellant used. THerefore, the vast majority of my 44-40 cartridges are loaded with powders within that range. I find that 2400 and 4227 to be excellent in that role.
w30wcf
2400 or 4227 (IMR?)
What about for the 45LC?
44-40 website - https://sites.google.com/view/44winchester/
44-40 Forum - https://44-40.forumotion.com/?fbclid=Iw ... XqHFnpPtgI
aka Savvy Jack
44-40 Forum - https://44-40.forumotion.com/?fbclid=Iw ... XqHFnpPtgI
aka Savvy Jack
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4559
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:52 pm
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Welcome, Savvy Jack!SAVVY_JACK wrote:Another forum with the same guys
Again, great topic, pards and information!
- Griff
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 20864
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Welcome Savvy-Jack. Fun post to review. Forgotten what I'd posted on it. Shot off an PM to a pard and then read on down and I had said the same thing in another reply... Must be slippin' another cog!!!
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
- Old Time Hunter
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:18 am
- Location: Wisconsin
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Hobie, hope you put this thread back in the stickies...too good to let it fall through the cracks.
- marlinman93
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 6490
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:40 pm
- Location: Oregon
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Some very good information here, and I like that nobody is getting their panties in a twist either!
I would just add that in over 30 years of owning and reloading old single shot and repeating rifles, I've used BP once, and wasn't all that excited about it. In these many decades I've used smokeless powders almost exclusively, and never hurt any of my old guns, or myself.
I think with proper care, either powder will be equally safe, so it's just a preference of what you personally enjoy shooting, and cleaning up after. I like smokeless.
I would just add that in over 30 years of owning and reloading old single shot and repeating rifles, I've used BP once, and wasn't all that excited about it. In these many decades I've used smokeless powders almost exclusively, and never hurt any of my old guns, or myself.
I think with proper care, either powder will be equally safe, so it's just a preference of what you personally enjoy shooting, and cleaning up after. I like smokeless.
Pre WWI Marlins and Singleshot rifles!
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
http://members.tripod.com/~OregonArmsCollectors/
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Hey Marlinman93.
You sure dug up an old post.
Pop
You sure dug up an old post.
Pop
-
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:29 pm
- Location: Idaho panhandle/Wyoming
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Dang, Pop....glad yer still with us..four years with some of us in the shape we're in makes you wonder. Anybody else from this old post still alive? Great info, by the way...Les
This is plagiarized from someone else, but I love it!
I was born a gun owner.
It wasn't a choice.
I didn't become one later in life.
I was born this way.
I was born a gun owner.
It wasn't a choice.
I didn't become one later in life.
I was born this way.
- otteray
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:25 pm
- Location: Monterey Bay,CA and Tahoma, at Lake Tahoe CA
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Interesting about Blue Dot and low pressure. I've got a full 4 lbs sitting unused since Hogdon gave it the heave-ho in the 41 mag. Is there any published data with it for 38 WCF?
I still haven't found anything to beat 6.5 gr Unique, though, for accuracy in the old Marlin 1889.
I still haven't found anything to beat 6.5 gr Unique, though, for accuracy in the old Marlin 1889.
otteray
-
- Senior Levergunner
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:14 pm
- Location: Billings, Montana
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
+1!JohndeFresno wrote:Bravo! Too much to absorb at one sitting - archiving all pages of this blog. Good work, gentlemen - very impressive research, observations, and dialog.
I too request this be a sticky.
"Any man who covers his face and packs a gun is a legitimate target for any decent citizen"
Jeff Cooper
Jeff Cooper
- Old Time Hunter
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:18 am
- Location: Wisconsin
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
What a great read...glad it was brought back up.
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4559
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:52 pm
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Pop Watts wrote:Hey Marlinman93.
You sure dug up an old post.
Pop
I second that motion - haven't seen your posts for a long time - good to hear from you!Les Staley wrote:Dang, Pop....glad yer still with us..four years with some of us in the shape we're in makes you wonder. Anybody else from this old post still alive? Great info, by the way...Les
- earlmck
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 3446
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:10 am
- Location: pert-neer middle of Oregon
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Yep -- I'll second that motion.Old Time Hunter wrote:What a great read...glad it was brought back up.
And though I haven't used it much in these black-powder pressure level loads, Blue Dot has been much nicer in the higher velocity (where you want a gas check bullet) loads than the 2400 generally recommended. But I surely can't find any published data in 38/40 and that data w30wcf found from the old Hercules book on the 44/40 is more than I could find amongst my collection on that cartridge.
And otteray, my Lyman manual #47 thinks Blue Dot is the best thing going in 41 mag. If I had a 41 mag and a batch of Blue Dot I would certainly be putting those little blue dots to use, even if Allient fails to recognize what a fine pistol powder it is.
The greatest patriot...
is he who heals the most gullies. Patrick Henry
is he who heals the most gullies. Patrick Henry
- otteray
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:25 pm
- Location: Monterey Bay,CA and Tahoma, at Lake Tahoe CA
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
I just emailed the powder company about the blue dot and was told that because of a different method of pressure testing combined with recent primer mixture changes, 41Mag is still considered a bad idea with Blue Dot.
otteray
-
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 2507
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:05 pm
- Location: Lampasas, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
KirkD"
Sent ya a PM
Sent ya a PM
Steve Young aka Nate Kiowa Jones Sass# 6765
Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550
http://www.stevesgunz.com
Email; steve@stevesgunz.com
Tel: 512-564-1015
Steve's Guns aka "Rossi 92 Specialists"
205 Antler lane
Lampasas, Texas 76550
http://www.stevesgunz.com
Email; steve@stevesgunz.com
Tel: 512-564-1015
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
I certainly agree with your comments. It's a topic to be "tucked away", and probably printed.JohndeFresno wrote:Bravo! Too much to absorb at one sitting - archiving all pages of this blog. Good work, gentlemen - very impressive research, observations, and dialog.
Thanks Mark
Re: Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders
Kirk, do you have the images of the pressure curve comparisons on your computer that you could post as attachments rather then the photobucket links which arent usable now? I tried getting into the album, but its restricted, and the pictures dont link back directly to see the originals hosted there. Many hotobucket images can still be seen on their site, but not 3rd party hosted. Unfortunately, the linked album is set to restricted access.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." -Theodore Roosevelt-
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Isnt it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?