modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
Forum rules
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
Welcome to the Leverguns.Com General Discussions Forum. This is a high-class place so act respectable. We discuss most anything here other than politics... politely.
Please post political post in the new Politics forum.
modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
Gentleman,
I have a model 1873 manufactured in 1892. It is .32-20 and I've acquired two different types of ammo for it. HSM 115 grain that is marked COWBOY ACTION LEAD, not load, lead. I also have some Remington Express Rifle .32-20 110 grain lead bullet. Are either or both safe to shoot in this rifle. The rifle has no issues. It functions well and is in good condition. I'm worried about pressures. I've checked the internet and as usual I find a multitude of opinions on modern day ammo in these guns. Some say the current ammo is loaded to lower pressures than late 1800's early 1900's loads. Others say no way. I called Remington and the tech I spoke to said he was unsure but wouldn't recommend it because SAMMI didn't exist at the time the rifle was made and it was made for black powder rounds. So I'm bringing my question to the most knowledgeable lever people I know.
Thank you for your assistance.
I have a model 1873 manufactured in 1892. It is .32-20 and I've acquired two different types of ammo for it. HSM 115 grain that is marked COWBOY ACTION LEAD, not load, lead. I also have some Remington Express Rifle .32-20 110 grain lead bullet. Are either or both safe to shoot in this rifle. The rifle has no issues. It functions well and is in good condition. I'm worried about pressures. I've checked the internet and as usual I find a multitude of opinions on modern day ammo in these guns. Some say the current ammo is loaded to lower pressures than late 1800's early 1900's loads. Others say no way. I called Remington and the tech I spoke to said he was unsure but wouldn't recommend it because SAMMI didn't exist at the time the rifle was made and it was made for black powder rounds. So I'm bringing my question to the most knowledgeable lever people I know.
Thank you for your assistance.
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
.
In a word, no - modern ammo is unsuitable in your 1892-era Model 1873.
Winchester had a problem making nickel steel barrels, so it was not until 1895 that all guns were considered suitable for smokeless powder.
I would recommend black powder loads only, as those early steels were much softer than later steel used in smokeless powder guns.
.
In a word, no - modern ammo is unsuitable in your 1892-era Model 1873.
Winchester had a problem making nickel steel barrels, so it was not until 1895 that all guns were considered suitable for smokeless powder.
I would recommend black powder loads only, as those early steels were much softer than later steel used in smokeless powder guns.
.
- Griff
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 20864
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:56 pm
- Location: OH MY GAWD they installed a STOP light!!!
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
+1. Use BP loads. 'Sides, that was all that rifle grew up on....Pete44ru wrote:.
In a word, no - modern ammo is unsuitable in your 1892-era Model 1873.
Winchester had a problem making nickel steel barrels, so it was not until 1895 that all guns were considered suitable for smokeless powder.
I would recommend black powder loads only, as those early steels were much softer than later steel used in smokeless powder guns.
.
Griff,
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
SASS/CMSA #93
NRA Patron
GUSA #93
There is a fine line between hobby & obsession!
AND... I'm over it!!
No I ain't ready, but let's do it anyway!
- ollogger
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 2807
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:47 pm
- Location: Wheatland Wyoming
- Contact:
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
I shot around 2 thousand rounds out of my 32-20 that was made in 1886
I used RL7 or 4198 & cast bullets & had no problems ever, I had some old Remington
factory ammo I also shot up in the gun & they were lead bullets also with no problems
years ago 2 old guys I knew hunted with factory ammo with 73s in 38-40 & 44-40 they used
them guns for years & had a lot of faith in them
ollogger
I used RL7 or 4198 & cast bullets & had no problems ever, I had some old Remington
factory ammo I also shot up in the gun & they were lead bullets also with no problems
years ago 2 old guys I knew hunted with factory ammo with 73s in 38-40 & 44-40 they used
them guns for years & had a lot of faith in them
ollogger
- AJMD429
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 32195
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:03 am
- Location: Hoosierland
- Contact:
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
Personally, I don't "know anything", but it doesn't stop me from having an opinion.
I'd either 'stick with BP loads' which would be hard to overdose on, pressure-wise, or. . . .
I'd use my own (or a trusted source of) reloads, with a suitable, similar-pressure-curve, low-pressure reloads, say with SR 4759 or some similar powder. The reason for that, vs. BP, is that those powders are ever-so-much easier (for me, at least) to keep from causing corrosion in my guns. Evidently for my great grandfather as well, as my 1889 Marlin has a very pitted bore.
Modern Smokeless Powders are NOT always 'hotter' or 'more pressure' than black powder; it depends on the specific powder and loading as to the pressure-curve. Of course for various reasons you can WAY over-charge with the modern powders and ruin a gun (or your face), so you have to use only the appropriate loads. Sticking with BP is easier in that area, but for me, it seems that no matter how thoroughly I soak and scrub my BP firearms after each use, there tends to creep in some corrosion.
But like I said, I don't know anything, or at least not much, about black powder.
Regardless, stick with 'low power' loads.
I'd either 'stick with BP loads' which would be hard to overdose on, pressure-wise, or. . . .
I'd use my own (or a trusted source of) reloads, with a suitable, similar-pressure-curve, low-pressure reloads, say with SR 4759 or some similar powder. The reason for that, vs. BP, is that those powders are ever-so-much easier (for me, at least) to keep from causing corrosion in my guns. Evidently for my great grandfather as well, as my 1889 Marlin has a very pitted bore.
Modern Smokeless Powders are NOT always 'hotter' or 'more pressure' than black powder; it depends on the specific powder and loading as to the pressure-curve. Of course for various reasons you can WAY over-charge with the modern powders and ruin a gun (or your face), so you have to use only the appropriate loads. Sticking with BP is easier in that area, but for me, it seems that no matter how thoroughly I soak and scrub my BP firearms after each use, there tends to creep in some corrosion.
But like I said, I don't know anything, or at least not much, about black powder.
Regardless, stick with 'low power' loads.
Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
"first do no harm" - gun control LAWS lead to far more deaths than 'easy access' ever could.
Want REAL change? . . . . . "Boortz/Nugent in 2012 . . . ! "
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
Yes, modern Cowboy type loads are safe in your original '73 since pressures do not exceed b.p. pressures. I have a '73 .44-40 made in 1883 and to date it has digested about 3,000 reloads, 2000 smokeless and about 1000 b.p.
Also consider the fact that starting in the mid 1890's the factories offered smokeless cartridges with "1873" specifically mentioned on the box.
w30wcf
Also consider the fact that starting in the mid 1890's the factories offered smokeless cartridges with "1873" specifically mentioned on the box.
w30wcf
aka John Kort
aka Jack Christian SASS 11993 "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." Philippians 4:13
aka w44wcf (black powder)
NRA Life member
.22 WCF, .30 WCF, .44 WCF Cartridge Historian
aka Jack Christian SASS 11993 "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." Philippians 4:13
aka w44wcf (black powder)
NRA Life member
.22 WCF, .30 WCF, .44 WCF Cartridge Historian
-
- Advanced Levergunner
- Posts: 4296
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:57 pm
- Location: Vinita, I.T.
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
I have a Winchester model 92 that was manufactured in 1892 in 32-20. The barrel was relined about 5 or 6 years ago and I shoot smokeless in it almost exclusively. Some think the 73 is not as strong but I bet they are both made from the same steel.
I would use the cowboy loads in your 73 without a bit of trepidation. The express loads should be reserved for model '92s.
Just my opinion.
I would use the cowboy loads in your 73 without a bit of trepidation. The express loads should be reserved for model '92s.
Just my opinion.
M. M. Wright, Sheriff, Green county Arkansas (1860)
Currently living my eternal life.
NRA Life
SASS
ITSASS
Currently living my eternal life.
NRA Life
SASS
ITSASS
-
- Levergunner 2.0
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:41 pm
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
I have several 19th century Winchester '73's and other makes. They never see black powder. Use cast bullets and the smokeless loads that are in some manuals listed for the old guns and you will get accuracy that cannot be found from factory ammo. Of course you should strip down and inspect the the rifles parts, or have someone do it while you watch so you'll know how it works and that everything is in good order. While it's apart clean and wipe everything all down with good oil, and grease as needed.
- Sixgun
- Posting leader...
- Posts: 18713
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: S.E. Pa. Where The Finest Winchesters & Colts Reside
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
Centennial wrote:I have several 19th century Winchester '73's and other makes. They never see black powder. Use cast bullets and the smokeless loads that are in some manuals listed for the old guns and you will get accuracy that cannot be found from factory ammo. Of course you should strip down and inspect the the rifles parts, or have someone do it while you watch so you'll know how it works and that everything is in good order. While it's apart clean and wipe everything all down with good oil, and grease as needed.
Centennial could not have said it better. You saved me lots of typing. But........I always got to get my two cents in........
I have wondered in amazement how I hear constantly that you should never....never shoot smokeless in an old BP gun. About 35 years or more ago, I happened on to a Smith New Model 3 in 44 Russian, an early one that was about worn out........and I wanted to shoot it. I heard about the warnings but common sense told me if you keep the pressure down....it's good to go......so about 3 grains of Unique got shoved in a case with a Lyman 44 caliber of some sort and I went to town.
Over the years I have owned and still own dozens of guns that were made during the black powder era and with the exception of a few near mint specimens, they get shot. A first year production 1881 Marlin, Colt Lightnings, 1873 Winchesters, along with a Remington Keene get shot regularly, each
digesting several thousand rounds of smokeless in competition and play.
Go ahead and enjoy your 32-20 and the factory ammo.------6
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
Thanks to all of you for your responses.
-
- Levergunner 3.0
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:21 pm
Re: modern ammo in an 1892 Winchester
Your lead bullet Remington ammo is probably OK in a '73. If it had jacketed bullets, I wouldn't use it because some of the jacketed stuff is equivalent to the Winchester HV ammo that has warnings not to use it in '73s and revolvers.
The Cowboy stuff, as mentioned is fine in a '73 in good condition.
The Cowboy stuff, as mentioned is fine in a '73 in good condition.